## Chapter 3## BASIC RELATIONSBecause of the reciprocal relationship between space and time and the limitation of both of these quantities to discrete units there are important differences in the various physical phenomena depending on whether the magnitudes involved are above or below the unit levels. We may conveniently regard these unit levels as dividing the universe into several general regions. At one extreme where space is less than unity there are time units only and space, as such, does not exist. This we will call the time region. Next we have a region in which one or more units of space is associated with a greater number of units of time. this region where the space-time ratio, or velocity, is below unity will be termed the time-space region. A similar region on the other side of the neutral axis where the space-time ratio is greater than unity is the space-time region, and at the far extreme we have the space region, where time is less than unity and therefore has no actual existence. If we set up a scale representing space we may depict magnitudes in the first two of these regions as in Figure 3-1. The line OA is a magnitude in the time-space region extending from zero space to n units of space. The space displacement is represented by the portion SA of the line and is equal to OA minus one unit. From a purely numerical standpoint it should be possible to indicate a magnitude in the time region by a similar shorter line since the space equivalent of a time region quantity is a fraction of a unit, but it will be noted that this would put the entire quantity within the area of zero displacement, whereas time region quantities actually do have time displacements. It is therefore necessary to represent the time region quantity OB as extending in the opposite direction from infinite time (the equivalent of zero space) to B units of time (equivalent of 1/B units of space). We cannot show magnitudes in the space-time and space regions on this same diagram as the initial point at zero time is equivalent to infinite space and cannot be adequately represented on a finite scale. However, if we change to a time scale we can draw the lines OA’ representing a space-time region quantity and OB’ representing a space region quantity (Figure 3-2) in the same positions as OA and OB in Figure 3-1. It should be noted that no magnitudes can extend to
the left of unit space in Figure 3-2 since this would represent less
than unit space, which by the First Postulate is time and hence will
be shown in in the direction OT. Similarly in Figure 3-1 no quantities
can extend to the left of unit time. If we start at zero space (infinite
time) and proceed in the direction of increasing space we will first
decrease time displacement. The boundary line of the time region is
reached when the time displacement becomes one unit (OB = OT in Figure
3-1). Any further increase in space requires a reversal of direction
and entry into the time-space region along the line OA. It is important
to note that the quantity transferred to the time-space region in
this transaction is one Any one-dimensional magnitude makes the transition from
the time region to the time-space region immediately on reaching unit
displacement. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional magnitudes, however,
cannot enter as a whole into the time-space region until unit displacement
has been reached in all dimensions. these multi-dimensional quantities
may therefore exist in intermediate conditions in which one or two
dimensions may have entered the time-space region while the remainder
are still in the time region. Since this partial transition will have
an important effect on physical properties we will recognize an To begin an examination of the regional characteristics we will look first at the time-space region, where units of space are associated with units of time. In the absence of space-time displacement any location A in space moves n space units in n units of time, since the ratio of space to time under these conditions is unity. Location A at time A therefore becomes A+n at time A+n. It should be emphasized particularly that this statement does not refer to some object that might occupy the location A, it refers to the location itself. Of course, if no other factor intervenes any object which might occupy location A at time A would also be found at location A+n in space after n units of time had elapsed, but this would not involve any movement of the object itself. The object remains at rest in space-time but the location in space which it occupies moves. This concept of space location as a constant progression rather than an entity at rest may seem somewhat confusing at first glance but it is merely an extenion of the universally accepted concpet of the progression of time. As pointed out earlier, the assumption of progressive time with stationary space could be reversed so that we would have progressive space and stationary time: a hypothesis which in most simple relations would serve equally as well as the more conventional assumption. Since we have postulated time and space as reciprocal forms of the same entity, however, it becomes apparent that the progression is a joint phenomenon resulting from the mathematical equality of the two space-time components in the undisplaced state. Generalizing the relations brought out in the foregoing
discussion we may say that any two undisplaced locations within the
time-space region, which differ by n units of space also differ by
n units of time. When an additional m units of time have elapsed they
differ by n+m units of time and also by n+m units of space, since
the ratio of space to time, the According to the Second Fundamental Postulate space and time are absolute in magnitude. Velocity, the ratio of the two, is therefore also absolute, but this does not mean that velocities are directly additive. If the velocities are low the departure from an additive relation is so small that no appreciable error is introduced by neglecting it. For instance, if two trains start from the same point and travel in opposite directions at velocities of 50 miles per hour each, we can say that the relative velocity, the rate at which the two trains move away from each other, is the sum of the two, or 100 miles per hour. But if we replace these relativelyi slow-moving rains with two objects moving at unit velocity the situation is quite different. Object A moves unit distance in one direction in unit time. Object B moves unit distance in the opposite direction in unit time. the two objects are now separated by two units of distance and if we were to adopt the “uniform flow” theory of time we would say that since the separation amounting to two units of space was accomplished in one unit of time the velocity was two units of space per unit of time, which maintains the additive relation. But the principles brought out in the previous discussion show that the separation in time between objects A and B is not one unit but two units and the relative velocity is 2/2 or unity. The same relation will hold good regardles of the angle between the directions of motion. This brings us back to the fact that unit velocity is
the condition of rest in the space-time universe, the zero level of
activity. Unit velocities add up to unit velocities in all directions
simply because the sum of any number of zero components is zero. The
real magnitude of any other velocity is not the numerical measurement
of the velocity itself but the The converse of this proposition is that where unit velocity is measured in some manner, the measurement is always the same regardless of the system of reference. It is immaterial, for instance, whether the measured quantity is the sum of the reference velocity and unit velocity or the difference between the two since the result is the same in either case: a+0 = a-0. This is a principle of some importance and we may express it specifically as follows: Unit velocity has the same magnitude relative to all reference systems. The validity of the foregoing statement has been substantiated by careful measurement, notably in the celebrated Michelson-Morley experiment, and the inability of Newtonian mechanics to supply an adequate explanation for it provided the incentive for the development of Einstein’s relativity theory. We can concur in Einstein’s second postulate, the constancy of the velocity of light, which we find to be merely one aspect of the status of unit velocity as the conditin of rest in the universe, but we cannot go along with the relativity theory any farther as neither the first Einstein postulate, which denies the existence of absolut velocity, nor the concept of space-time as four-dimensional, is in accord with the findings of this work. It is interesting to note in this connection that those consequences of the relativity theory which have been the most difficult to reconcile with ordinary human experience are reduced to readily acceptable terms by the postulate of three-dimensional time. For instance, proponents of the relativity theory have indulged in the interesting speculation that if it were possible for someone to leave the earth and travel on a rapidly moving object through space, returning at some later time, the elapsed time on the rapidly moving object would be less than the elapsed time on earth and consequently the individual would return to find that all of his associates had grown old during the (to him) brief interval that he was gone. Such sensational but highly incredible possibilities are flatly denied by the concept of absolute three-dimensional space-time. From the relations which have been developed in this work we find that the hypothetical traveler would indeed move away from the earth in time as well as in psace but on his return trip he would reverse his direction both in time and in space and at the end of his journey would be back to earth time. Furthermore, his clocks, contrary to the relativity assumptions, would not alter their registration, his aging would continue at the normal rate, and the time difference through which his frame of reference passed would remain unknown to him. Clocks merely indicate the relative motions of their parts, relations which are totally unaffected by the velocity of the system in which they are situated. Where no impediment to motion exists only unit velocity
is possible. Hence if there is any displacement of space-time whereby
the amount of one component becomes greater than than of the other
there must be a reversal of direction so that the same unit of the
smaller component can be traversed repeatedly. This is a vibratory
motion, which we call a A frequency greater than unity is a multiplace space vibration; that is, n units of space per unit of time. This is quite easily visualized. We could, for example, construct an instrument in which a pointer moves back and forth over a fixed path. If we adjust the speed of movement so that the pointer traverses the full path in exactly one unit of time we have a representation of unit frequency. then if we speed up the movement we can cause the pointer to traverse its path n times in one unit of time. Here we have a frequency of n units of space or half-cycles per unit of time. A frequency less than unit is a multiple time vibration: n units of time per unit of space. Although this is somewhat more difficult to visualize it is clearly the same thing in the reciprocal form. This vibratory motion provides us with an illustration, which shows how it is possible for n units of time (or space) to be associated with one unit of space (or time) in a particular phenomenon, even though basically a unit of space and a unit of time are equivalent. In undisplaced space-time there is a progression of one unit of space from A to B simultaneously with the progression of one unit of time from A to B. Because of the directional properties of the universe, however, we may have a second unit of time progressing in the original direction AB to C, while space reverses and progreses one unit from B to A. The motion as a whole then involves two time units AB and BC, but only one space unit AB, which has been traversed in both directions. Looking at this situation purely from the standpoint of the individual units, there has been a progression of one unit of space simultaneously with each unit of time, as required by the Fundamental Postulates. From the standpoint of the frequency phenomenon as a whole, however, only one unit of space has actually taken part in the action and so far as this phenomenon is concerned, the two units of time are associated with only one unit of space. The concept of a frequency introduces into our study
for the first time a Let us now assume that a frequency originates at some
point A in space-time. After n units of time have elapsed space and
time will have progressed to A+n. The frequency, which must remain
stationary in space-time, as it has no mechanism of movement, is carried
along with the space-time progression and hence moves outward at unit
velocity from the point of origin A. If we now set up a theoretical
three-dimensional system of reference points that occupy fixed locations
relative to A and do not progress with space-time, we find that the
direction of motion of the frequency with reference to our fixed coordinates
is indeterminate. Outward from point A may be in any direction relative
to our three-dimensional reference system. All directions are equally
probable under the circumstances and if a large number of frequencies
originate at the same point A the probability relations require that
they be distributed equally in all directions. If we observe a surce
of frequencies from a three-dimensional reference system, we will
find that the frequencies are moving away from the source in all directions
at unit velocity, the frequencies emitted simultaneously traveling
in the form of an expanding spherical surface. This is the phenomenon
which we know as This radiation is not propagated through a medium. Neither does any effect which may result from the radiation represent “action at a distance.” From a space-time standpoint the frequency is not moving at all. It remains at the point of origin in space-time but that point itself moves, or we might say that it is succeeded by a series of other locations with different space and time coordinates, just as we ordinarily conceive of one instant of time following another. In order to follow out the program outlined in the introductory chapter and compare the hypothetical universe developed from the two fundamental postulates with the actual physical universe quantitatively as well as qualitatively, it will be necessary to ascertain the relationship betweent he natural units in which our calculations will be made and the arbitrary units, which have been taken as standards for the customary systems of weights and measures. Most of the accepted units of measurement are secondary; that is, they are derived from other units, but there are a few which are fundamental and the only means by which we can establish the relations between these basic units and the corresponding natural units is to select some readily identified physical magnitude involving each unit and compare the values which are obtained for this magnitude by the two methods. The unit of frequency is an appropriate quantity from whch to determine one of these conversion factors. The value of unit frequency in the c.g.s. system
has been calculated from related frequencies. This value, know as
Rydbrg’s fundamental frequency, is 3.2888 x 10 With the iad of this natural unit of frquency we
are now able to evaluate the natural unit of time. The natural unit
of frequency is one natural unit of space per natural unit of time,
but the failure to recognize the role of space as a ocmponent of frequency
hes had the effect of using the natural unit of space in combination
with the c.g.s. unit of time as the c.g.s. unit of frequency. In other
words, omitting considerationof the space factor in the value of the
unit has the same effect as giving it a value of unity. The The Since the natural unit of velocity, 2.9989 x 10 Here we have the explanation of ur distorted view of the space-time relations: the reason why space seems so much more real and understandable to us than time. The region of the universe is which human activities are centered is displaced far over on the time side of the neutral axis and hence we are dealing with rerlatively large time magnitudes and relatively smallspace magnitudes. As a result we get a close-up view of space and a distanc view of time. The common units of space and time are not directly
comparable since they were set up independenly without any idea that
there was a definite relationschip between the two phenomena, however
their practical utility depends on thier being of the same order of
magnitude with respect to human sensation. Because they are designed
to be useful the centimeter and the second or any similar pair of
practical unit of space and time are approximately equal from the
human standpoint; that is, they are about equally distanc from the
threshold of sensation. But the second, the unit of time which to
us is of the same order of magnitude as the centimeter, is actually
3 x 10 We have here a difference comparable to looking at a forest first from a distance of a few yards and then from an airplanne several miles up. Fom the close-up view-point we able to distinguish the details: the kind of trees, their size, spacing, etc. Furthermore it is quite apparent that the forest is three-dimensional. On the other hand we learn nothing at all about the extent or shape of the wooded area. From the plane the latter information is ascertained but we can gain no knowledge about these details which were so easilyobserved from the first vantage point. Here we are even be able to recognize more than one dimension. Form our position in space-time far over in the time direction we can get a close-time view of space, enabling us to recognize details susch as the multiple dimensions, but or field of vision ia too narrow to bring out the characteristics of space in the aggregate. Our view of timefrom across on the other side of the universe discloses the major features susch as the continous progression but furnishes no details. Lets us now return to a further consideration itself
as radiation the frequency may ecquire a rotational motion, in which
case it gives rise to an entirely different character of phenomena
and we are justifiedin considering it as having become an entity of
a different kind. These new effect, however, are not due to any differences
in the motion itself; all motion in space-time is governed by the
same laws. The result entirely from the From a translatory standpoint the net result of a rotational cycle at unit velocity is zero. Since both time an dspace are directional, the path of rotation is curved in time as well as in space and when the cycle complete the rotating point has returned to the same location in space. Progress in any particular direction has been offset by an equal amount of progress in the revers direction, whit a resultant of zero both in space and in time. This principle may be further extended by the observation that the path followed in motion from point A to point B has no bearing on the final result, as long as unit velocity is maintained troughout. It is immatrial whether the motion is entirely in translation, entireli in rotation, or is combination of the two. Any changes in space direction are exactly paralleled by corresponding changes in time direction and when point B is reached in space it is also reached in time.The essenc of the situation is again the fact that unit velocity is a state of rest in the space-time universe, in rotation equally as well as in translation. When rotational velocity differs from unity; that is, when a rotational displacement exists, there is a translatory as well as a rotational effect inasmuch as the rotational velocity is is always directed tangentially. The rotation may assume either of two directions: clockwise or counterclockwise, according to the usual terminology. One of these directions is obivously the direction space-time progression and the other it therefore opposite to the progression. A net rotationin the direction of the space-time progression is impossible since this, Together with the progression itself would mean a velocity greater than unity and, as we hawe found in our consideration of translatory motion, the resut would be an oscilation. The independend rotation must therefore be in the direction opposite to the space-time progression. Let consideer a frequency A which has ritation with
respect to reference point B actual in magnitude but opposite in direction
tothe space-time progression. We will also assume for present purposes
that A and B are so loceted that the space-time progression is invard,
tending to cause these two points to approach each other. (The factor
influencing the direction of the space-time progression will be discussed
later). Here we have a In this illustration it is quite clear that both
motions are actually taking place and that the apparent lack of movement
is due to one motion cancelling the effect of the other. For many
purposes, however, it willbe convenient to regard the potential motion
in each direction as having been suppressed by the potential motion
in the opposite direction. Looking at the situation from this standpoint
each of the potential velocities is a Because of the important role played by force inthe physical universe it is desirable to establisch definite mathematical relations between this and related quantities before proceeding farther. From the fundamental entity
For more rigorous mathematical treatment both velocity and acceleration should be set forth as differentials:
The
in order to complete the coverage of the velocity
group it should be noted since both space and time exist in three
dimensions, velocity can also be two-dimensional or three-dimensional.
We therefore compute the
and
Now were are conforted with a new concept, that of force, and the immediate problem is to relate it to the velocity group from which it differs in important respect. We find that one set of conditions existing in the system under consideration would normally result in velocity in a particular direction. Another set of conditions existing simultaneously cals for velocity in some other direction. In the kind of a universe which we have postulated both motions cannot manifest them-selves by corresponding changes in actual position. To some extent, therefore, there must be a substitution of tendency to move for actual motion: a substitution of force for velocity. One fact that stands out clearly in this preliminary consideration is that a force canot exist alone. Force comes into being only when motion is prevented and it exist as force only as long as the impediment persists. When the impediment is removed the force is transformed into motion. Now let us take a look at the nature of thus inpediment: the something that resist the eforts of force to cause motion. It must, of course, be some function of x velocity, since the tendency tomove in a contrary direction in the basis of the conflict that brings force into existence. On the other hand it is diametrically opposite to velocity in character since velocity is a measure of motion whereas we are now dealing with the capacity to resist being moved. A further characteristic of this entity is that it must be three-dimensional as ther would be no impediment to the space time progression in any vacant dimension that might exist. Taking all of these points into consideration we find that we have a picture of an entity which has the properties of the reciprocal of three-dimensional velocity. We will call this entity mass. The natural unit of mass is equal to the cube of unit time divided by the unit cube of unit space.
In the c.g.s. system the unit can be evaluated as follows:
This unfamiliar (but convenient) expresion can be
converted to any desired scale of mass by dividing by the appropriate
This is aproximately one-third of the observed mas of the smallest unit of matte, the Hydrogen atom. The exact relation of the Hydrogen mass to the natural unit will be developed later in the study. We are now in a position to define force with more precision. Since mass is the entity to which the force is applied and acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, the effect of a force, which we may consider to be a reflection of its intensity, is measured by the product of the two.
Breaking these quantities down into thier component parts we have
This idicates that force is the analogue of acceleration, the form of the fundamental equation being the same whit time and space interchanged. It shoukd be noted, however, that these two entities do not stand in reciprocal relation to each other as do time and space, mass and three-dimensional velocity, and other pairs of physical quantities which will be studies later. The natural unit of force is unit time divided be the square of unit space. In c.g.s. unit it is
Again dividing by the gravitational constant
An interesting point disclosed by the foregoing discussion is that force is actualy simpler from a dimensionalstandpoint than mass, involving only two dimensions of space and one of time, whereas mass involves three dimensions of each. This sugests a further dimensional simplification on to yield t/s the reciprocal of velocity, which could logically be expected, on the basis of the facts already developed, to be a fundamental quantity of major significance in physical relation. This expectation is very definitely borne out. To obtain the quantity t/s we must multiply force by distance. But force time distance is the expresion for work or energy.
Energy then is, the reciprocal of velocity. Where
motion is not impeded the space-time displacement manifests itself
as velocity; where an inpediment exist it manifests itself as energy.
We recognize two general forms of energy:
On this basis kinetic energy can be expressed as **, the factor ½ being a methematical consequence of the integration porcess. The
Dividing by the gravitational constant
Another basic quantity which should be consideredat this time is momentum, the product of mass and velocity. Breaking htis expression down into space-time therms we have
wich shows that momentum is the second power of energy,
just as mass is the third power. The
Again dividing by the gravitational constant
Closely related ot momentum is
The In the foregoing discusion it has been establisched that mass and the fundamental quantities associated wuth mass constitute a family group whose relations to time are parallel to the realtions which the corresponding members of the velocity group bear to space.To sumarize the situation the following tabulation has been prepared.
The relations treated in the foregoing discussion
form the basic for Newton’s celebrated
For the first law we let F = 0 and we then find that a must also equal 0. A zero rate of change is, of course, no change at allan dthe motion must therefore continue uniformly. This applies to direction as well as to the scalar magnitude of the velocity since accelration is a vector quantity. This first law is often expressed in a menner which draws a distinction between bodies at rest and bodies in motion, a distinction which serves no useful purpose as a body at rest is merely in the limiting condition of motion where the velocity is zero. The second law *****. This equation also holds good in vector as well as scalar from, hence it applies to both magnitude and direction. The third law is a statement of the General Reaction Law as it applies to this particular field.
Analogous to the Third Law of Motion which is an application of the General Reaction Law to a limited field we have the various Conservation Laws which are applications of the General Conversation Law to limited fields. These subsidiary laws may be summed up in one.
This is a mere truisum but it leads to the most useful
expression of the General Conservation Law as it means that the total
space-time displacement in dimensions canot be altered by any process
within the physical universe except one that cause transfers from
one dimension to another. In one dimension this is the familiar While it has been neccesary to qualify the Dimensional Conversation Law by a significant reservation, this law is nevertheless one of great practical usefulness at its several forms are valid troughout the entire range of ordinary human experience. Only in axceptional situations does the posibility of a dimensional change enter the picture. The outstanding instance in which such a change does take place is the transformation of mass into energy, a process which involveles a transition from t³ / s³ to t / s. From this relation it is evident that one natural unit of enrgy will be released for each natural unit of mass converted. Owing to the great disparity in size between the two units from our one-sided human viewpoint, however, the amount of energy relased appears to be extremely large inpropoortion to the mass involed. The quantitative aspects of this transition will be examined in a subscequent chapter after the property of mass has been studied in more detail. |